![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
OCW
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) is delivering on MIT's promise to share knowledge openly: through it all MIT course materials will be accessible on the Web, free of charge, to any user in the world. Millions of educators, students and self-learners around the globe are avidly using the 1250 courses now available (the initiative will include materials from approximately 1,800 courses by the year 2007). Importantly, more than 60 other institutions around the world have adopted the "opencourseware" concept, and are now freely disseminating their knowledge and materials as part of the burgeoning OpenCourseWare Movement. CommitmentIn 1999 an MIT faculty committee was charged with determining how MIT should position itself in the distance/e-learning environment. After a year of market research and analysis, the committee concluded that a revenue-generating model was not viable for MIT. Instead—convinced that open software and open systems were the wave of the future—the group came to a simple, but very elegant, conclusion: MIT should use the Internet to give our teaching materials away. Posting course materials online is not, of course, equivalent to offering the experience of an MIT education; that can be had only by interacting directly with MIT professors and other MIT students. But making MIT course materials available online sends a strong message about the university's values: in the era of the Internet economy, MIT values openness and learning over financial gain. When OCW was first announced, one of the unresolved issues was how MIT would pay for it. In July 2002, we received grants totaling $11 million, contributed in equal amounts by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. In addition, MIT committed $1 million of our own funds to OCW, with a pledge to continue sustaining the program through our regular operations budget. StrategyWhile faculty and administrators were enthusiastic about the concept, the delivery was potentially more challenging. Making course materials suitable for the Web is more difficult and time consuming than simply posting a PDF. The MIT strategy called for a central support organization that could help produce the Web sites.
With OCW staff members helping transcribe lecture notes, dealing with intellectual-property issues, and providing assistance with graphics and Web design, the course sites are published without requiring extraordinary efforts by any individual professors. ImpactA significant portion of our professors have told us that they use MIT OCW materials to prepare for their classes, do research, and help their students. An MIT structural engineer, for example, discovered the work of a colleague in ocean engineering and incorporated that material into a monograph on wave vibration. Over time, we expect that such collaborations will spur innovations in all kinds of interdisciplinary education and research. And by digitally archiving our faculty's course materials in DSpace (link to this case study), we will preserve a record of MIT's continuously evolving curriculum. But the real payoff is OCW's effect on educators and learners around the world. In November 2005 the site had 30,000 unique visitors a day—nearly 1 million a month. Self-learners account for 48% of those, with educators comprising 13% and students 31%. Mirror sites have translated and distributed the information around the world, especially where Internet access is limited. Ultimately, our goal was to create a model that other universities could follow and improve. Today, the OpenCourseWare Consortium is a collaboration of more than 60 higher education institutions and associated organizations. They are in the U.S., China, France, India, Japan, Portugal, Spain, and Vietnam. Together, they are creating a broad, deep body of open educational content. LeadershipAnne MarguliesAnne Margulies is the executive director of MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) initiative and brings 20 years of leadership experience in strategic planning, information technology and operations to the MIT OCW project. She came to MIT in May 2002 from FH/GPC, a government relations, public affairs, and communications consulting firm where she was the Chief Operating Officer responsible for the overall performance of the firm. Prior to her time at FH/GPC, Anne was the executive vice-president of McDermott O'Neill & Associates, where she restructured the senior management team and planned and managed the sale of the company to GPC International. From 1986 to 1998, Anne held information technology positions at Harvard University, serving as assistant provost and executive director for Harvard's Information Systems department with responsibility for all centralized administrative IT activities. Before coming to Harvard in 1986, Anne was a Senior Account Manager in the higher education sector for AT&T. VideoCNN: Global ChallengesWindows Media streaming: Broadband (220K) Dialup (56K) Measuring SuccessACCESS: Traffic to the OCW site is steady, increasing and progressively global.
ACCESS: Visitor educational role distribution and profiles remain about the same.
ACCESS: The OCW site receives significant traffic from educational institutions, the United States military and high technology companies.
IMPACT: Visitors indicate that OCW has already had significant impact on their teaching and learning and expect even greater impact in the future.
Evaluation conducted from October 1 through December 31, 2004. Information gathered from Web analytics, online intercept surveys, site feedback and interviews with a subset of people. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |