October - December 1997 Issue
Reducing Indoor Air Pollution and Saving Energy, Too
esearchers
in MIT's Building Technology Program and the Energy Laboratory are studying
an approach to ventilation that is radically different from that now used
in the United States and could both improve indoor air quality and save
energy. While conventional ventilation systems mix large quantities of
newly conditioned air into the air in a room, "displacement ventilation"
systems prevent mixing by injecting limited amounts of air, slowly and
near the floor. Pollutants and heat that are produced by people and equipment
rise naturally to ceiling exhaust vents, and the fresh air rises into the
breathing space. The difficulty is that the precise system specifications--air
temperature, velocity, and so on--must be tailored to the space being ventilated
or occupants may be uncomfortable. The MIT researchers are developing tools
that can help. They have formulated a computer model that calculates how
different system specifications affect airflows and heat and pollutant
dispersion in a well-defined room. And they have built a full-size experimental
room in which they can test the effects of different ventilation strategies
in various situations (an office with two "people" in front of
computers, a classroom with "students" behind desks). The model
predictions and experimental results agree quite well, and both confirm
that a well-designed displacement ventilation system can provide clean
air and comfort and also reduce the amount of ventilation air that must
be heated or cooled--now a major consumer of energy in commercial buildings
To reduce energy use, owners and designers of buildings
seal up leaks, maximize insulation, and install ventilation systems meant
to provide occupants with clean, conditioned air. However, those ventilation
systems don't always work as planned. In some cases, airborne contaminants
and heat generated indoors by building materials and equipment--and even
normal human "effluents" such as carbon dioxide--become trapped.
The impact on the comfort, health, and productivity of occupants can be
serious. Numerous "sick buildings" have required evacuation and
repair, even state-of-the-art new construction such as the headquarters
of the US Environmental Protection Agency.
The traditional approach to ventilation does pose potential problems. The
goal in conventional "mixed-flow" ventilation is to mix up all
the air in the room, producing an even temperature throughout the space
and diluting any pollutants. Typically, ventilation air is injected at
high velocity at or near the ceiling. If mixing is not sufficient, stagnant
areas can occur in the "occupied zone" nearer the floor. And
while mixing does dilute pollutants, it also sweeps them away from their
sources and distributes them throughout the room, exposing all occupants.
In addition, mixed-flow ventilation requires large quantities of air that
must be heated or cooled by energy-consuming devices.
During the past three years, Professors Qingyan Chen and Leon R. Glicksman
and their coworkers in the Building Technology Program and the Energy Laboratory
have been studying a radically different approach to ventilation. The approach,
called displacement ventilation, seeks to prevent mixing rather than cause
it. Cool, clean air enters a room at a low level at low velocity, flooding
the floor much as water would. Heat and contaminants emanating from people
and equipment tend to occur in isolated "plumes" hovering above
individual sources. In the absence of mixing, those plumes of warm, contaminated
air rise naturally toward the ceiling, where they are vented. As they rise,
the plumes entrain the surrounding air, lifting the cool ventilation air
to the breathing level of the occupants. Because the clean air is supplied
directly to the lower, occupied area rather than mixed throughout the whole
room, less air is required. Moreover, the entire room need not be as cold
to provide a comfortable air-conditioning effect. The result is reduced
energy use. (Most commercial buildings require cooling even in winter.
However, conventional heating systems can be used simultaneously as needed.)
Displacement ventilation originated in Scandinavia and is now used widely
in Europe. However, in the United States it has been installed at only
a few experimental sites. Today's US building regulations are based on
mixed-flow ventilation and require more air than is typically delivered
by displacement ventilation systems. Moreover, there is little pressure
to change those regulations, largely because of serious concerns about
comfort. With displacement ventilation, fresh air flows directly into the
occupied zone. If the air is too cold, moving too fast, or fluctuating
in velocity, people get cold feet. Also, the air at an occupant's feet
is cooler than that at his or her head. If the difference is too large,
the occupant is uncomfortable. Discomfort may be more of a problem in US
buildings than in European buildings because the former generally have
higher cooling loads than the latter.
Recognizing the potential benefits of displacement ventilation, the MIT
researchers are working to examine and ensure its effectiveness using two
coordinated approaches: they are developing new computer models that can
simulate conditions in a room with displacement ventilation, and they are
gathering data in a full-size experimental room.
Designing a displacement ventilation system for a given space involves
many decisions. For example, what type and how many diffusers should be
used to distribute the air, and where should they be located? What should
the temperature, velocity, and humidity of the input air be? The optimal
specifications depend on the size and configuration of the room; the number,
location, and types of heat and pollution sources (people, equipment, lights,
furniture, and so on); and many other factors. An appropriate computer
model would enable a designer to analyze the ventilation needs of a specific
space and to define a system that would ensure good air quality, comfort,
and energy efficiency.
To identify a suitable model, Professor Chen and his colleagues examined
standard "computational fluid dynamics" (CFD) models that describe
turbulent flows like those that occur in rooms with displacement ventilation
systems. However, the standard models proved inadequate. In general, they
are designed for smaller-scale applications such as airflows in fans or
over aircraft wings. In addition, they cannot accurately simulate the behavior
of buoyant plumes--a behavior critical to the flows of air, heat, and pollutants
in a room with displacement ventilation.
Professor Chen's group has now developed a CFD model that incorporates
a new, simplified technique to simulate the turbulent airflows in buoyant
plumes. For a given situation and ventilation system, the model predicts
distributions of air velocity, temperature, and contaminant concentrations
throughout a room. The new model can be put on a personal computer and
in less than an hour's time produce a good first prediction of air circulation
patterns--a marked contrast to traditional CFD models, which require large-capacity
computers and extensive computing time.
To validate the model under a variety of well-defined conditions, Professors
Chen and Glicksman have built a special facility at MIT--a full-size room
with a controllable environment. The room is about 5 m long, 3.5 m wide,
and 2.5 m high. It is built inside another room, enabling the researchers
to select and maintain a constant wall temperature, change the building
materials, and add windows as needed to simulate different external situations.
The researchers can use a variety of diffusers with different designs and
can control the properties of the ventilation air. Instruments located
throughout the room measure temperature, humidity, velocity, and velocity
fluctuations. To observe patterns of air circulation directly, the researchers
create a plane of light cutting across the room by shining a powerful slide
projector through a narrow slit or by using a rapidly oscillating laser
beam. They then inject puffs of smoke into the room and capture images
of the smoke's movement using video recording equipment placed perpendicular
to the plane of light. Finally, they can inject a tracer gas at various
locations to mimic a pollutant being given off by a person or machine.
The compositions of samples collected at various locations show how the
tracer gas disperses throughout the room.
The space outside the experimental room houses the controls--a variety
of computer displays that allow the user to select conditions and observe
effects in on-screen diagrams of the room. The controls are designed both
for ease of operation and for use as a teaching facility.
To simulate specific situations, the researchers "furnish" the
experimental room in various ways. For example, the figure below shows
the room as a small two-person office. Sitting at tables are two "occupants"--square
models with heat sources inside. In front of them are computers and monitors
that generate heat. Typical office lights are overhead, and one wall contains
an external window. In another setup, the room represents a section of
a large office that contains two occupants sitting on opposite sides of
a partitioned cubicle. And in another, the room is a quarter of a large
classroom. Six "students" sit at tables facing the front of the
room. In each case, the setup is altered to reflect summer and winter conditions,
with the latter including a heat source and a cold exterior window.
In a series of tests, the researchers operated the experimental
room and the new CFD model under similar conditions. In most cases, the
model's predictions match the experimental results well. The calculated
and measured temperatures and velocities throughout the room agree closely.
Predictions of velocity fluctuations are not as good, in part because velocities
are so low that measuring fluctuations is difficult. Predictions of the
tracer gas concentrations are reasonably accurate, though large discrepancies
occur at some locations. Smoke-visualization tests show the incoming air
falling gently to the floor and then slowly drifting upward. Plumes of
smoke appear above people and equipment, swirling and rising like smoke
coming out of a chimney. In general, the studies confirm that a properly
designed displacement ventilation system can indeed provide both clean
air and comfort.
The researchers are continuing to use the model to simulate different situations.
They are now performing tests in a privately owned facility that replicates
a large industrial workshop. They are also using the model and parallel
experiments to measure the airflow in fume hoods, including those used
in biology laboratories at MIT. Results show that the hoods use airflows
higher than required to ensure removal of contaminants--a significant loss
of energy. In addition, they are looking into health-care applications.
If displacement ventilation systems were used in hospitals and shelters,
germs from patients with communicable diseases would rise to the ceiling
rather than being spread to other patients.
Meanwhile, they are expanding the capabilities of the model. They are adding
equations that describe chemical interactions among airborne contaminants.
Thus modified, the model will be able to predict what reaction products
will form and where substantial buildup may occur. And they have developed
computer codes that calculate energy use associated with a given simulation.
Already they are analyzing the energy use and costs associated with designing,
installing, and operating displacement ventilation systems versus conventional
mixed-flow ventilation systems. Ultimately, they plan to develop a set
of design guidelines that they hope will reduce the amount of airflow required
under today's building regulations--a change that could produce substantial
energy savings nationwide.
Qingyan Chen is assistant professor of building technology. Leon R. Glicksman is professor of building technology and director of MIT's Building Technology Program. This research was supported by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers; Halton, Inc.; Trox GmbH; and the National Science Foundation. Further information can be found in references.